Evidence Of Moon Landings

[Guest red7]

For years many people have suspected the Apollo Moon Landings where faked. Know with the use of a high powered telescope and high resolution images google prove the landings did take place. The images show the moon landers on the Lunar surface. See for yourself at: http://moon.google.com/

[Guest Bazwaz]

Moon? looks more like Chedder Gorge to me!

Barry.

[Guest stevec]

LOL

[Guest timswait]

Must be a mistake, they don't seem to have the Wallace and Grommit landing marked on...

[Guest micky bigthumbs]

first time i looked i didnt get it but got it second time when zoomed in

[Guest chris brown]

Moon? looks more like Chedder Gorge to me!

No Baz I recon that is the Dutch region

[Guest Bazwaz]

Must be a mistake, they don't seem to have the Wallace and Grommit landing marked on...

You need to zoom in a bit more.

 

 

Barry

[Guest red7]

So Guy's why can't NASA or astronomers publish a photograph of the moon landers and the junk they left behind on the Moon? For heavens sake the Hubble can magnify to a zillion times, so they have the technology. Anybody know the answer?

[E.Hunt]

Hubbles still looking for the ones lost on mars

[Longboarder]

What would be the point. Conspiracy theorists who deny the moon landings would say the Hubble pictures were fake.

 

Nigel

[Guest micky bigthumbs]

the mohave desert and hanger 51 still show the longest runways on earth or the moon

[Knock-on]

I find these pictures non-conclusive. Until I see a picture of the moon with the big Red double decker bus on it, I will never believe them.

 

After all, it was in the Sunday Sport

[Guest Captain Daz]

NASA can't turn a telescope on the moon to show the landing sites because the earth and orbiting telescopes are set to pick up very dim and distant stars/nebulae etc. If they pointed them at the moon on a clear night their optics would fry. It's like yur eyes being set to ambient earth daylight and then you looking through a telescope at the sun. Instant retina on toast!

 

As for the fake landing theory: I did hear a story about one of the astronaughts (Buzz Aldrin I think) being at some do and a young chap approached him saying he thought the landings were faked. So Buzz lamped him one. Now I'm not one for unprovoked violence but I think this was well deserved.

 

On a diferent note, I think we should make Wallace and Gromit the RHOCaR mascots. Just like us really. Making things out of other peoples junk. Even their moon rocket had a repositioned handbrake!

 

Cheers

 

Daren

[Guest red7]

The Truth is out there. We could be seeing an image soon.

 

 

"We are observing some of the landing sites for calibration and ground truth purposes," said Bernard Foing, Chief Scientist of the ESA Science Program.

 

Foing told SPACE.com that the SMART-1 orbiter circling the Moon has already covered the Apollo 11, 16, 17 landing sites, as well as spots where the former Soviet Union’s Luna 16 and Luna 20 automated vehicles plopped down. The images have not yet been released............

 

 

Oh No! Just read to the end of the Forum Report.

 

"Oh yes, it will transmit one picture every 2.5 seconds as it descends, for nearly 12 minutes. Trouble is, ESA will then release them at the rate of one picture a month, over a period of about 15 years".

 

Cheers, ESA!

 

In the same article "Hubble has been used for Lunar observation but the landers would only appear as black dots" Not designed for this job unfortunately.

[Guest crwoodford]

One of the first pics from Mars....

Col (Taunton)