The DOHC engines are not Zetec or Duratec, but are an older generation that are quite suitable for use in our context.
The 2.3 DOHC 16-valve is derived from the 2.0 DOHC 16-valve, which itself is a derirative of the 2.0 DOHC 8-valve (as fitted to Sierra & late-model mk3 Granada), but the 2.3 has some fundamental differences on the crank, as it incorporates a Lanchester balancer shaft.
This makes the engine slightly taller than the 2.0, so is probably unsuitable for an 2B, as it would simply make ground clearance and/or bonnet (bulge?) clearance a bigger issue.
As standard, the EFi's were (when new!) :
The 2.3 DOHC 16-valve "Y5A" gave 147bhp @ 5600 with 150 lbft @ 4250
The 2.0 DOHC 16-valve "N3A" gave 136bhp @ 6300 with 129 lbft @ 4200
The 2.0 DOHC 8-valve "N9B" gave 125bhp @ 5500 with 128 lbft @ 2500
(Only the 2.0 DOHC 8-valve ever came in a carburettor version, but less power)
I believe the 2.0 DOHC 8-valve is the best option - just look at the low-rev torque delivery.
This 8-valve engine is mostly found with the excellent MT75 gearbox, instead of the A4LDE auto that is on the vast majority of 16-valve 2.0 or 2.3 engines.
Maybe you could fit a Type 9 box to a DOHC, but its probably not easy as I think the bolt pattern is different.
On the basis that you would have to use the MT75, then only the 2B-DOHC chassis is suitable as the MT75 is wider than the Type 9.
The MT75 can be very easily rebuilt at low cost to incorporate the high 5th gear from the rare Diesel Granada/Scorpio MT75 box, and allied with the rear LSD from the (even rarer) 4x4 DOHC Sierra (3.9:1) can give nice results in a 2B-DOHC SS chassis without sacrificing acceleration due to the 8-valve torque characteristics.