Jump to content

Snapperpaul

Community user
  • Posts

    5,568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Posts posted by Snapperpaul

  1. I had an issue similar that turned out to be a broken wire in the plug to the crank position sensor, it was intermittent.

    I ended up putting a new sensor plug and wire back to the EDIS.

    I also put a support bar across sensor plug to stop cable flexing at the point it goes into the plug.

    Sorted it

  2. So glad this worked

    Thank you to all who responded, I did a bit of behind the scenes on this and got a mixed reception on a few sites, I contacted Adam @ Complete Kitcar a bit late in the day when responses from other forums was less than I had wished for and Adam used his extensive contacts to keep the momentum going and this was the result

    Excellent.

    • Like 2
  3. Just to cut through a bit of the speculation and hopefully add a bit of clarity....

     

    The only easily found Sierra viscous LSD is the 3.62 or 3.64 ratio generally 3.62 is a 7 and 3.64 is a 71/2

    The 3.92 was a 7 only found on the 2.0L DOHC 4x4

    The viscous diff is a softer street LSD, generally they are sealed for life and as they have silicon fluid you can fit and forget, I personally would not fiddle with it as it has a specific sized air bubble in it. I know that oval racers sometimes pump air in to make the diff stiffer.

     

    I run an ATB only because it fitted my push in shaft back end.

     

    Most of not all Sierra viscous diffs are bolt on.

     

    The reality of an LSD on the road is that it benefits the sporty driver, either viscous or ATB, plate diffs are mostly on or off and you can never set it up for all conditions.

     

    An LSD will tend to push you straight (understeer) but you can compensate easily in your driving style and/or change your setup a bit, certainly the drive out of corners is great and confidence in the fast corners is a delight.

     

    The Sierra viscous diff is the cheapest, easiest to fit and an excellent upgrade for the road.

    And of course the bragging rights

  4. I have fitted thick metal plates inside the tunnel to stop the prop breaking through if it did let go.

    Alternitively you could use square tube.

    The tunnel is an important part of the chassis integrity so youll need to do some serious work to get it safe.

    Consider running a central box spine from back to front

  5. I used inverted ally rivnuts uncompressed or very lightly compressed, drilled the supports so the rivnuts went through then cut back rivnuts so there was some compression but not a lot as the rivnuts now provides the support.

    Behind the frame I used some small angle that bolts to the support, the frame rests on this and it further supports the screen.

    The crews that pull the bottoms of the frames together were replaced with long thin nuts and bolts with the nut reccessed in the lower frame and bolt cut back

  6. I ran without screen in the early days, now enjoy screen doors and wipers.

    The S3 has a narrow scuttle so you may have to modify an aero screen to fit or go bespoke

    The original roll bar was mostly cosmetic and needed a lot of modification to the rear tub to have any real use in a roll.

    I think the bar was made out of industrial 2½ heating pipe and have looked at fabricating a full cage running under the roof but close behind the screen, through the scuttle picking up on the tub box folds that run either side but have now bought a Fury as well so all further modifications will go in the Furys direction for now

  7. Now this thread is starting to pi55 me off.

    Part reading the consultation to find the bit you like and ignoring the rest

    OR

    deciding its retrosoective when it clearly is not

    WHICH

    starts others off on promulgating the incorrect facts and blurring the discussion

     

    No rule change regarding cars has EVER be applied retrospectively

    Excepting some easily achievable safety issues such as tyres

  8. I didn't think that IVA was an issue. 4.10 on the first post seems to say that IVA won't be affected.

     

    However MOT will be if the changes come into force.

     

    The whole document is here

     

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/678209/road-vehicles-improving-air-quality-and-safety.pdf

     

     

    You emissions are dictated by IVA and put on your V5 in this case the newest requirement

    On my test emissions were done first, fail that and they dont progress with the test

  9. From what i read above, and i Might not have this right so correct me if i am reading this wrong...

     

    Current situatuion is If you are making a car and want it registered with an age-related plate (e.g. 2001) you use parts from a car that is that age, same as always. This is no different to if i drive a car of the same age. It's mot is tested to 2002 standards.

     

    What this is saying (from what i understand) is that although you have a 2001 plate car we are going to test you for a 2018 car. So we won't be giving you the benefit of a 2018 plate but we'll give you the hassle of having to meet it's standards.

     

    Additional concerns, apart from additional cost, is taxation. What will it be taxed as? If it uses the new system you might get away with it being cheaper to tax. But what if you spend a load of money getting to the 2018 standard but you are still taxed on the old rules.

     

    Given that DVLA aren't exactly consistent with kitcars, i can imagine a fair few problems at the MOT station with the automated system.

    Thats a good point about registration plate.

    Also what had not been said is what happens to a Q plate.

    I get the feeling this is purely an emissions based consultation and the registration plate options are not being considered

  10. YOU NEED TO READ THIS

     

    Kit car emissions

     

    Taken from www.gov

     

    Road Cars

     

    Improving air quality and safety

     

    Kit cars

    4.10 Kit cars and reconstructed classic cars undergoing IVA will not be required to meet WLTP, given that at present they are not required to meet NEDC or the latest EU standards. Instead they are tested to age-appropriate MOT standards, on the basis of the date of manufacture or first use of the engine.

     

    4.11 We are proposing that for kit cars, compliance with the MOT emissions standards current at the date of registration will be required, despite the use of an older engine. In other words the current relaxation for emissions according to the age of the engine will no longer apply.

     

    4.12 Reconstructed (restored) classic cars undergoing IVA will not be required to meet the latest MOT standards, as long as the appearance of the vehicle is broadly unchanged and the engine is of the same capacity as that supplied with the vehicle when it was new.

     

    4.13 When new vehicles were first required to be fitted with catalytic converters around 1992 (Euro 1 emissions standard), kit car makers typically used older engines which were not fitted with catalytic converters, hence the justification for age-appropriate testing of emissions based on date of engine manufacture or first use. The majority of the fleet is now vehicles up to 25 years old whose engines are fitted with catalytic converters, providing plenty of choice to the kit car builder.

     

    Question.

     

    Are you content with our proposal to require kit cars to meet the latest MOT standards, removing the current rule where vehicles are tested to MOT standards according to the age of their engine?

     

    The consultation period begins on Friday 2 February 2018 and runs until Friday 2 March 2018. Please ensure that your response reaches us before the closing date. If you would like further copies of this consultation document, it can be found at https:// www.gov.uk/dft#consultations or you can contact us using the details below if you need alternative formats (Braille, audio CD, etc.).

    Please send consultation responses to: Robert Lloyd-Smith

    Zone 1/33, Great Minster House

    33 Horseferry Road

    LONDON SW1P 4DR

    Email to: ivs.consult@dft.gsi.gov.uk

    When responding, please state whether you are responding as an individual or representing the views of an organisation. If responding on behalf of a larger organisation, please make it clear who the organisation represents and, where applicable, how the views of members were assembled.

    A list of the main representative bodies consulted is attached at Annex E. If you have any suggestions of others who may wish to be involved in this process please contact us.

     

    Annex E: List of those notified of the consultation

    Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) National Motor Dealers Association (NMDA)

    Vehicle Bodybuilders and Repairers Association (VBRA) National Caravan Council (NCC)

    Wheelchair Accessible Vehicle Converters Association (WAVCA) British Independent Motor Traders Association (BIMTA) American Import Agents Association (AIAA)

    Niche Vehicle Network (NVN)

    National Trailer Towing Association (NTTA)

    Recovery Equipment Manufacturers and Suppliers Association (REMSA) Road Safety Markings Association (RSMA)

    Freight Transport Association (FTA)

    Road Haulage Association (RHA)

    Confederation of Passenger Transport (CPT)

    Transport for London (TfL)

    Local Government Association (LGA)

    Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership (LowCVP)

×
×
  • Create New...