Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
GCash

Windscreen Marking

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I am coming to the end of the build of my Robin Hood 2B and I am just in the process of fitting the windscreen. I have read numerous threads and the IVA manual and just want to confirm a couple of things.

 

These are the markings on my windscreen...

 

post-14134-0-09422600-1539249409_thumb.png

 

Am I correct in thinking that this won't get through the IVA because of the missing Roman numerals above the E?

 

If I remove the windscreen, wipers, heater and washers and get it through the IVA would it be a bad idea to fit it anyway because it would be too dangerous?

 

Thanks

Graeme

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You've probably seen it, but this was a thread I raised before I built...

 

http://www.rhocar.org/index.php?showtopic=41972

 

I agree, it's missing the numerals, but it does have TEMPERED written on it clearly. And, for what it's worth, on my IVA I never noticed the tester take a long hard look at the marking anyway. Given it's almost a mandatory 1st fail on IVA anyway, I'd be tempted to run with it as-is and if it fails you can remove the glass as a template and get one made up with the correct markings, refit and retest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, no. If you want a windscreen, then it makes far more sense to put the necessary related items (wipers, heater, squibbers) in place while you are building, it is so much easier and you're not then ripping the car apart again after IVA to retrofit it all. There is no challenge to putting a car through IVA with a windscreen bar the rear view mirror vibration that I encountered (and ultimately fixed!)...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt the powers that govern our car building hobby can & do watch our views on "work-rounds" & one day they'll start insisting the car as presented will be its final guise ( maybe excepting minor changes) & build photos will become file photos. Mot's are carried out on production cars & they must comply with "as built" legislation, so why not apply the same to our cars --- used as built.

 

We may not like or agree with all the points of IVA but we are playing on the roads with all the other souls & as such the rules should be respected.

 

Florin's windscreen is a cut down Land Rover County 'screen retaining all the codes in the right bottom corner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

None of the windscreens from RH will pass the IVA as they are not laminated and don't have the // symbol. Pilkingtons should have the template for the RH 2B as I sent it to them and bought a screen. was around £250. might be cheaper now they have the template.

 

Nige

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't want to be driving behind a tempered glass windscreen if it shattered. Even though the particles are supposed to be blunt they can still damage your eyes. I got my marked laminated windscreen cut at a tractor windscreen suppliers of all places!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe some members will attest to that. That's why I bought some marked, laminated screens. I've had one go already (my fault) and it was at least an excuse to verify the behaviour... which was as expected :) ie. no face full of glass.... :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

took a land rover defender windscreen to local glass shop and they cut to shape leaving all the markings cost £20 plus £35 for the screen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At some point i'll do mine but in the meantime i've got some plastic safety film to prevent flying bits if it shatters.

 

I do wonder though whether in some respects safety film on the back is actually better than laminated. If you hit laminated hard enough shards can break away from the back and are sharp as it isn't toughened, if you have film on the back nothing can be thrown backwards. but i guess laminated must be stronger and will stop the odd pedestrian going through (well probably not in our cars as the screen surround isn't strong enough to prevent that).

 

this had some interesting points assuming they are correct https://www.quora.com/Why-are-front-windshields-the-only-laminated-glass-in-cars-Cant-they-use-the-same-for-rear-windshields-and-side-windows

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By raeautos
      Check on preloved website
      http://www.preloved.co.uk/adverts/show/119139907/robin-hood-kitcar-track-day-car-with-car-trailerono.html?ref=advert-
    • By kgnoble
      Well it failed!   
      Full story is in the blog, but the majority of stuff was very minor, a loose screw here, a missing grommet there.  Most important was that he spotted a very small leak in the master cylinder - I will replace that very shortly.  There was also an issue with the (MotaLita type) steering wheel which has too many holes and too much wood.  Otherwise, side repeaters apparently necessary, and the rear foglamp/reversing light combo needing a shim to make it present the light horizontally on a sloping surface.
      What was obvious was that a neatly presented car immediately gets the examiner on your side.  I suspect he erred on the generous when assessing seat heights, headrests, two speed wiper speeds, headlamps and quite a lot else.  He was very happy to chat and was pleased to see that I obviously had worked through the IVA manual.
      So - another month to fix the items, a retest and I should be away.
      Thank to you all for your comments and support - it has been incredibly helpful and generous.
      Cheers
       
      Keith
      www.cageyenne.co.uk/wp
       
    • By GCash
      Hello, I thought I would let everyone know how I have got on with putting my Robin Hood through the IVA and to ask a few questions...
      My Robin Hood 2B was given to me by my kind friend part finished, I believe it was originally bought in 2002.  It is based around a 1989 Sierra with a 2.0l Pinto with a 30/34 DFTH Weber carb.  I have stripped it down and finished it over the last eighteen months and I am quite pleased with the result (or at least I was).
      Attempt one happened at the beginning of May and didn't go well at all.  Prior to the test I had a garage down the road check it out and everything seemed ok apart from a bouncing fuel gauge.  I didn't get the car back in time to sort the fuel gauge, so I just had to go for it.  On the day of the test I filled it up at the petrol station in preparation for the fifty-mile journey from Blackpool to Chatterton.  Fuel ended up leaking everywhere from the fuel sender and the car started running rough.  Before I got too far from home, I just took it round the block where I broke down a few times as well as got pulled over by the police.  I had all the relevant paper work so being pulled over wasn't an issue and I managed to limp the car home.  Unfortunately, I couldn't make it to the test so £450 down the drain.
      Before my next attempt I serviced the carb, replaced the fuel lines, filter and fuel sender, fitted new spark plugs, leads and coil (from Accuspark) as well as checking the ignition timing and mixture. The timing was out, and I set it to about six degrees with the vacuum lines blocked as per the manual.  There was also a leak on the line from the manifold to the servo which I fixed.
      Yesterday I set off nice and early for attempt two.  Everything went well for the first twenty-five miles until I could feel the car needing more and more power to maintain speed.  I pulled over and found that the brakes had come on and while I at the side of the road they came on completely.  After looking around it I suspected that the servo was at fault either too hot, getting to much vacuum or faulty.  I managed to get to the test centre (with frequent stops to keep checking) and on the way there the car started to run quite rough. It struggled to pull away and didn't like running at slow speed although it idles fine. Despite being late they completed the test and found the following...
      Metered Emissions - the HC reading was 4260 when the max is 1200.  The car struggled to run at the required 2,000 rpm it just kept hunting between 1,000 and 3,000.  The reading from the garage prior to attempt one was fine, well below the limit.  I suspect I have messed up the mixture after the carb rebuild. Brake pipe or hose must not be exposed to excessive heat.  The car has the original sierra manifold and the exhaust has a heat wrap around it.  The servo is close to the engine and heat shield I made is obviously not up to the job (see picture, although the heat shield has been removed).  I am thinking about removing the servo all together as described in other posts and then make a bigger heat shield. Brake warning light - The light on the dash functions with both the handbrake and the low brake fluid level switch.  However, the low fluid switch doesn't seem to work.  Am I correct in thinking that if I fix the low brake fluid switch and can prove it works by unscrewing the top that will pass?  I can test the light from the driver’s seat using the handbrake or do I need a separate switch? A couple of sharp edges right under the dash that I missed.  I have already put edging on them. The hand brake isn't working on the near side wheel.  I will have to investigate. Brake lights are on all the time.  I knocked the brake switch off while checking my brakes when stuck at the side of the road and have now fixed. Side repeaters are mounted on the body of the car and do not give the five degrees of visibility from the rear.  I need to move them to the cycle wings. Headlight aim was out, I must have knocked them as they had been aligned by the garage. Fog lights come on with the side lights.  I going to change the switch feed using diodes as described by other posts. Pinch nut on the from suspension was loose.  The pinch bolt was tight, and I had put a safety bolt through to dummy strut but completely missed this.  Stupid boy! Maybe unsurprisingly because of the brake issue they wouldn't let me drive it home and I had to shell out to be recovered to Blackpool 😢.  Yesterday was a very frustrating day to say the least! I have already fixed some of the issues and apart from the engine and the brakes my car is fine, ha!
      When I got home, I checked the spark plugs and they are black, so I guess it is running rich?  I have a colourtune kit but I was struggling to use it, I will have to have another go.
      My dilemma now is how best to take it for the retest, do I risk driving it again?  And, how am I best getting the engine tested/tuned without having the ability to drive it?  Maybe I need to find someone with a trailer for the retest and a rolling road session?
      Graeme
       




    • By GCash
      Hello
       
      I have just about finished my Robin Hood but there seems to be a problem with the idle. After a couple of minutes it starts going lumpy and cuts out. It keeps cutting out if I don't hold the throttle open slightly.
       
      It is a 2.0l Pinto with a Weber 30/34 DFTH. I noticed there is a pipe coming from the carb that looks like a breather (black and red). The problem stopped when I sealed the end of this pipe. This may be a stupid question but, does anyone know what it is for? Is it originally from the air cleaner?
       
      Thanks
      Graeme

×
×
  • Create New...